Review ------ 'As We May Think' by Vannevar Bush In the article 'As We May Think', the author, Vannevar Bush, holds up an incentive for scientists in the post World War II era. In order to handle the sheer volume of information becoming available to research scientists, Bush argues for the need for new methods of data acquisition, storage, and analysis. For the purpose of data acquisition he proposes the use of a head mounted camera and dry photography. He proposes extending the technologies that had already been realized: facsimile and television. Bush addresses the issue of storage by counting on microfilm technology motivated by the fact that it provided an inexpensive solution. He suggests dictation technology as a means to extend the written knowledge and an extreme approach of devising a natural language suited particularly for analysis and parsing by the machine. Bush does a great job of predicting the advanced capabilities of computers (of the future) in the fields of advanced mathematics, logic problem solving, etc. He also recognizes the essential need for digital indexing of documents for the automatic retrieval of the same from mass storage. He introduces memex, a hypothetical, desk-size information workstation, which contains a massive amount of microfilm that stores documents. In this system, documents could be recalled by document code and page number and displayed on a screen. His key observation was that of associative annotation and selection: arbitrary pages could be linked together to form a trail of documents. This is probably the first description of hypertext, which forms the basis of the World Wide Web today. A key aspect to note is that Bush does not consider/discuss digital content storage. Since Bush's notion of storages was not digital, he has had to rely on manual indexing of documents. Also, his design lacks the ability to search for 'keywords' in the knowledge system. Each individual using the memex system maintains a local copy of the knowledge base (library data, etc) and is responsible for constructing trails. This is clearly undesirable as the same trail might have been to be created several times over. He presents a poor model of knowledge dissemination: users share trails only by hand. But with the help of networking, publish/subscribe systems, and search engines, today's users can share and access information at lightning speeds presenting a much better model of knowledge dissemination. In conclusion, Bush does a good job of proposing novel solutions to create and organize data and predicting capabilities of technological devices of the future.